text size A A A

A Win for Breast Cancer Patients and a Challenge to a Drug Maker

Breast cancer patients scored a win this month when medical wisdom triumphed over drug company hype at the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The oncology advisory panel voted 6-0 to withdraw approval for Avastin for breast cancer. This unanimous vote virtually assures that the FDA Commissioner, who makes the final decision, will pull the temporary approval granted in 2008 on the basis of evidence that later proved misleading.  

The panelists agreed that Avastin does not prolong life or improve quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients. Moreover it is extremely toxic and often kills the patient. 

The drug's manufacturer, Genentech, ran its publicity engines in overdrive for many months, to influence patients and their doctors to demand continued FDA approval. At hearings held June 27 and 28 at FDA, advisory panel members were treated to emotional witnesses begging for continuation of the breast cancer indication that costs the health care system $88000 per patient per year, giving Genentech revenues of $1 billion a year.

But four advocates testified in favor of withdrawal--including SHARE's own Helen Schiff.  Helen was able to represent the views of many knowledgeable advocates who take part in SHARELeaders. SHARELeaders spent many months reading about and discussing Avastin's pros and cons. Some initially thought Avastin should keep its indication for breast cancer "just in case" in might help. But over time as the evidence was exposed, just about everyone involved in these discussions came to the same conclusion that the FDA panel reached. 

For breast cancer patients now taking this dangerous drug who want to continue it, there will be no legal reason why they can't take it, if they can find a doctor to prescribe it "off label." But insurance companies may (and should) decide not to reimburse for it. Genentech, which earns $7 billion annually from  Avastin for all cancers, should give it to them free.

 

Posted July 5, 2011.

« Next Post  |  » Previous Post

Comments

Please feel free to leave comments, as they’re helpful for other readers. However, if you need support from SHARE, please call or email our Hotline.

 
Thank you, Gail, Helen, and SHARE. You are right that this is "A Win for Breast Cancer Patients" and I so appreciate the clarity of your post in explaining why that is. Women living with metastatic breast cancer deserve treatments that are shown to work. At Breast Cancer Action we also came to the same conclusions you did about Avastin: http://bcaction.org/2011/06/28/testimony-for-fda-hearing-on-proposal-to-withdraw-approval-for-the-breast-cancer-indication-for-bevacizumab-avastin/.

Thanks again for your advocacy on behalf of women living with breast cancer.

— Caitlin Carmody, Breast Cancer Action

 
Gail, I wish the 12-0 vote to remove the Avastin indication in breast cancer did "virtually assure" action on Margaret Hamburg's part to withdraw the indication. I'm not at all sure that is the case, as the action doesn't have general support in either the patient or oncology community.

— Musa Mayer

All comments are reviewed by SHARE before they are posted. You will not see your comment here immediately.

 clear!